The Narrow Path Women Walk in Leadership
Author’s Note
I write for women who lead in real organizations, not leadership poster organizations. This piece is about the narrow path many women walk at work: leading with clarity while managing double standards around tone, authority, and accountability. It explores why leadership can feel heavier for women, and what changes when we stop treating that weight as a personal challenge instead of a structural one.
Introduction
A few months ago, I watched a familiar moment unfold in a meeting that was already running late.
A woman leader delivered a clear recommendation. It was specific, grounded in the work, and it required the men she worked with to be accountable for missed commitments and uneven performance.
It did not go well.
The conversation shifted immediately. Not to the substance of what needed to change, but to tone. To intent. To a steady stream of explanations, deflections, and attempts to redirect responsibility. She had to keep pulling the discussion back to the work so it stayed productive. She adjusted in real time. She softened her language. She added context. She navigated bruised egos while holding the line on performance.
All of this happened in front of more junior employees, who were watching closely. By the end, accountability was technically accepted, but the cost was visible. Not just to her, but to everyone in the room.
After moments like this, many women do not just feel tired. They quietly wonder whether leadership is supposed to feel this hard, or whether they are failing some test they cannot quite see.
Not because the work was hard.
Because holding people accountable required constant self-monitoring.
Leadership is hard for anyone. But women are often doing two jobs at once: moving the work forward, and managing how their leadership will be received.
That is the narrow path.
The Double Standard That Shapes the Path
Most women recognize this early, even if they cannot name it yet.
Speak up and you risk being labeled “too much.”
Hold back and you risk being overlooked.
This is why women get so good at timing. At phrasing. At reading the room. Not because we love communication strategy, but because we have learned what happens when we do not.
And in the middle of all that, the work still needs a decision.
The Meeting Reality Nobody Writes Down
You can tell a lot about an organization by what happens when a woman is speaking and someone decides to talk over her.
If you are interrupted, you learn to recover without sounding “sharp.” You learn to reclaim time without escalating. You learn to finish your point even when the room tries to move past it.
One of the most practical pieces of guidance I have seen is also painfully simple: if you are interrupted, reclaim your time with a calm line like “I’d like to finish my point.”¹ The fact that women have to practice that sentence tells you everything.
It sounds small until you realize how often it happens. Constant re-entry into the conversation pulls attention away from strategy and into self-management.
Responsibility Without Authority
Another feature of the narrow path is this: women are often trusted with outcomes before they are trusted with power.
You get the critical project. The sensitive client. The cross-functional work that needs translation, alignment, and follow-through. You are relied on because you are capable and steady.
But when it comes time to make the final call, set priorities, or enforce tradeoffs, decision rights get vague. Authority gets shared. Ownership gets blurred.
So women adapt.
They identify who actually holds authority in the organization, often men with positional or political power, and they build relationships so those leaders will back them when it counts. They learn who needs to reinforce a decision so it will stick. Who can step in when accountability is challenged. Who can say the same thing and have it land faster.
This is not weakness. It is strategic awareness.
But it is also extra work.
When a woman’s authority is questioned, or when others resist following through on responsibilities she owns, she often has to call in reinforcement to make the leadership real. The decision does not change. The work does not change. Only the voice validating it does.
From the outside, this can look like collaboration.
From the inside, it can feel like borrowing credibility you should already have.
And when that reinforcement has to happen publicly, especially in front of more junior staff, it quietly teaches the organization whose authority really counts.
The Stress Layer That Does Not Show Up on Your Calendar
There is a reason women leaders often feel like they are doing constant mental math.
HBR notes that executive and professional women consistently experience more stress, anxiety, and psychological distress than men, and points to stereotype threat as a primary driver.² Stereotype threat is not abstract. It is the split second where you realize you are being evaluated for more than the work. It is the moment where you adjust your delivery because you can feel the room forming a judgment about your tone, not your content.
That split second adds up.
It shows up as over-preparing, self-editing, and replaying conversations later, not because you lack confidence, but because you are managing the penalty that can come with being direct.
Politics Are Real. You Can Stay Principled Anyway.
If you have ever said “I hate politics,” you are not alone. Most people mean they hate manipulation, gossip, and back-channeling. They hate the extra work it takes just to get the work done.
But politics also includes something more boring and more useful: understanding how decisions get made, who has influence, and how to move work through a system without abandoning your values.
Forbes makes the point plainly: politics exist in every organization, whether we acknowledge them or not, and the goal is learning to navigate them in a way that aligns with your values.³ That is not selling your soul. That is leadership literacy.
Here is how this connects to the narrow path.
The narrow path is what happens when your leadership is treated as conditional. When you can do the same things others do, but you have to do them with more calibration. When holding people accountable turns into managing egos. When your authority is questioned, and you have to decide whether to push, soften, or go find someone with more positional power to reinforce what should have been accepted the first time.
Politics are the terrain that creates those moments. They decide whose voice carries, whose pushback is tolerated, and whose clarity gets labeled. Women do not experience “politics” as a game. They experience it as the hidden tax on doing their job.
For women, this matters because avoiding politics completely often means doing more work with less leverage.
What Happens When Women Stop Over-Calibrating
When women stop treating the narrow path as something to quietly endure, the work gets more honest. Not colder. Cleaner.
In practice, it sounds like this:
“I’ll take care of it” becomes “What needs to change so this is sustainable?”
“I don’t want to come across too strong” becomes “Clarity is part of my job.”
“I’ll smooth this over” becomes “Let’s fix what keeps creating this friction.”
The shift is not attitude. The shift is design.
A Personal Note on Leadership
I used to think leadership meant having the answer.
Now I think leadership is more often this: making the best call you can with imperfect information, staying open to what you learn next, and not confusing confidence with certainty.
Most leaders are not walking around with complete certainty. They are building conviction as they go. Some just have the privilege of being perceived as confident by default.
Women are often building conviction while also managing perception.
If you are tired, it might not be because you are doing it wrong. It might be because you are doing it in a system that still makes leadership feel conditional.
Leadership equity is not a vibe. It is an operating model.
-
In your next meeting, track who gets interrupted. Hand the floor back once: “I want to hear her finish.”¹
Clarify decision rights on one project. If responsibility is assigned, authority should be visible too.
Take one piece of invisible work and name it. Put it on a rotation. Stop letting it live in one person’s personality.
Use one calm boundary sentence once this week: “I’d like to finish my point.”¹
-
If you rely on a few women to keep things smooth, you do not have a culture. You have a dependency.
Audit who gets high-visibility work and who gets glue work.
Watch meeting dynamics in real time. The work is not only what gets decided, but who gets heard while it’s happening.¹
Do not confuse “having a powerful ally to back her up” with giving her authority. Backup is episodic. Authority is structural.
If your women leaders have to route accountability through someone else’s voice to make it land, the operating model is telling you something. Fix that.
Develop political skill as a leadership capability, not an informal gatekeeping mechanism.³
References
Forbes Coaches Council. “Breaking Barriers: 4 Communication Challenges for Women in the Workplace.” Forbes, 2025.
Kramer, A. S., and Harris, A. B. “Why Women Feel More Stress at Work.” Harvard Business Review, August 4, 2016.
Forbes Coaches Council. “How to Navigate Corporate Politics Without Selling Your Soul.” Forbes, 2025.
